# Nvidia reports tonight, and this time the trusted voices showed up > Nvidia prints after the close. Across the accounts Quantral tracks: 386 mentions in three weeks, a crowd running 3-to-1 bullish, and the accounts with real track records at 6-to-1. In July, Tesla and Alphabet went into their prints on 10 to 13 percent trusted volume. Nvidia goes in at 30 percent. By Maya Koeva · 2026-08-26  Nvidia reports second-quarter results tonight after the close, the last megacap print of the summer. Every outlet has a preview of the numbers. Ours reads the room instead: what the accounts Quantral tracks have been saying for three weeks, and whether the people saying it have been right before. The short version: the room is loud and bullish, and this time the conviction is not coming from tourists. That last part is what separates tonight from the July megacap prints. ## Seven red closes into a print Start with the tape, because the tape is what makes the room interesting. Nvidia closed at $225.30 on August 13. It then closed red seven sessions in a row: $225.16, $225.01, $219.74, $217.56, $216.85, $214.72, and $208.48 on Monday, a 7.5% slide with no single headline to pin it on. Tuesday broke the streak, up 2.2% to $213.05. *[Chart: Nvidia daily closes, July 27 to August 25: an 18% run into mid-August, then seven straight red closes into the print, and one green day right before it.]* Through all seven red days, Nvidia's score on Quantral refused to follow the price down. The 7-day score sits at 75 this morning and the 24-hour score at 77. A falling price with a holding score is a disagreement, and tonight is the kind of event that settles disagreements quickly. ## The room, counted Over the last 21 days on Quantral's charts (August 6 through this morning, with today still filling in), Nvidia drew 386 subject mentions from 168 different accounts: 228 mentions from 43 handles on X, 158 from 125 accounts across the subreddits we track. The split runs 224 bullish to 71 bearish with 91 neutral, a shade over 3-to-1. For scale: Nvidia did not even make the eight loudest names in [last week's scoreboard](/blog/loudest-stocks-aug-17-21), where the cutoff was 51 mentions. Over the last seven days it is the second-loudest name in our entire coverage, 178 mentions, behind only Moderna's vaccine-news pop at 215. The room assembled fast, and it assembled while the price was falling, not after a move it could chase. *[Chart: Nvidia mentions on Quantral, August 6 to 26: green most days, one red bar on Monday's seventh straight down close, then the biggest bullish bar of the month going into the print. The last bar is partial, counted through early Wednesday.]* That chart contains one net-bearish day. Look at where it lands. ## Who blinked on the red days Monday was the seventh straight red close. That day's count flipped to 11 bullish against 16 bearish, the only net-bearish day Nvidia has printed all month. Tuesday the stock bounced 2.2%, and the crowd bounced with it: 31 bullish to 11 bearish through early Wednesday, the biggest bullish bar of the month. The [tracked accounts](/learn/how-a-track-record-is-graded) did neither. Through Monday's red close they held at 4 bullish to 3 bearish, and through early Wednesday they sit at 9 to 0. Across the full three weeks the contrast is the same: the whole crowd runs 3.2-to-1 bullish, but the 21 accounts with a credibility score above 0.5 and at least ten graded calls run 62 to 11, nearly 6-to-1, and their lean has not moved all month. One group repriced its opinion off a single red day and repriced it back off a single green one. The other decided weeks ago and let the tape disagree. ## The receipts Those 87 tracked-account mentions have names attached. These are the accounts making the call over the last three weeks, with their [credibility score](/learn/what-is-a-credibility-score) and lifetime graded calls next to their Nvidia record: | Account | Credibility | Graded calls | NVDA, last 3 weeks | | --- | ---: | ---: | :-- | | @TheValueist | 0.78 | 1,170 | 16 bullish, 1 bearish | | @CKCapitalxx | 0.80 | 736 | 3 bullish, 2 bearish | | @daniel_koss | 0.73 | 329 | 2 bullish, 0 bearish | | @ParadisLabs | 0.67 | 1,281 | 2 bullish, 0 bearish | | @jukan05 | 0.71 | 167 | 7 bullish, 1 bearish | | @epictrades1 | 0.54 | 97 | 13 bullish, 2 bearish | | @amitisinvesting | 0.57 | 67 | 6 bullish, 0 bearish | | @PegasusFund | 0.51 | 67 | 0 bullish, 2 bearish | The bull case running through those mentions is specific: a valuation that has compressed while earnings kept growing, Rubin's performance and power economics lowering data-center cost per token, and buyers treating seven red days as an entry into a quarter they expect to be strong. [jukan05](/blog/who-is-jukan05), whose room we profiled last week, has stayed bullish while flagging the sharpest bear datapoint in the set, a TrendForce report on foreign suppliers losing share in China. The bears are worth reading because there are so few of them. PegasusFund argues the price increases ahead of earnings strain customer goodwill and that Nvidia's chip-financing deals load risk onto its own balance sheet. And the most repeatable bearish observation in the room is about the event itself: Nvidia has a habit of moving less than option buyers hope on earnings night, and of selling off even on beats. The last print tested that one directly. ## The same test, reversed from July When we ran this exercise for [Tesla and Alphabet the night they reported](/blog/tesla-alphabet-pre-earnings-chatter) in July, both rooms leaned bullish, and we called the lean thin, because only 10% of Alphabet's mentions and 13% of Tesla's came from accounts with a track record. That was expectation, not conviction: a catalyst on the calendar pulling in accounts that show up for catalysts. Nvidia tonight is the same test with the opposite result. Trusted accounts supply 30% of its 386 mentions, three times Alphabet's July share, and the biggest track records in our coverage are on the bullish side of it. Whatever tonight brings, that is the reading [the credibility layer](/learn/smart-money-vs-the-crowd) exists to give you. Loudness and credibility are separate measurements. In July they disagreed; tonight they point the same way. ## What May says about tonight A fair reader should hold one thing against everything above: we saw this exact setup three months ago, and it did not pay. Going into the May 20 print, Nvidia's room on Quantral looked almost identical: 323 mentions over the prior two weeks, the crowd just under 2-to-1 bullish, the tracked accounts at 43 to 7, better than 6-to-1. Nvidia closed at $223.21 that day, closed lower the next, gave back 10.2% over the following three weeks, and at Tuesday's $213.05 it still sits 4.6% below that print-day close. The tracked room went in 6-to-1 bullish in May, and three months later the stock has gone nowhere. A 6-to-1 room does not decide a quarter, and we are not going to pretend it does. The reading gives you positioning with provenance: who is leaning which way, on what record, before the fact. That is also why this piece is publishing this morning and not tomorrow, when hindsight is cheap. The read goes on the record now, and we will grade it after the print, the way this section just graded May's. ## What tonight settles The consensus Nvidia has to clear tonight is roughly [$2.09 in adjusted earnings per share on $92 billion in revenue](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nvidias-q2-earnings-to-test-resurgent-ai-trade-112502189.html), with the call at 5pm ET. One print will settle three open questions in our data at once: whether the tracked room's month-long lean beats the crowd's day-trading of its own opinion, whether the score's refusal to follow seven red days was signal or stubbornness, and, one ripple out, whether the [memory-stock rooms we covered last week](/blog/jim-cramer-memory-stocks) get their AI-demand thesis confirmed by the company all of their theses run through. The live reading, the mentions, and each account's record are on the Nvidia page in Quantral now, while the print is still ahead of you. --- *Methodology: mention counts are subject mentions across the accounts Quantral tracks, bucketed in rolling 24-hour windows matching the in-app chart, bucket days August 6 through August 26; the final bucket is partial, counted through early Wednesday morning ET. "Trusted" means the author's credibility score is above 0.5. The receipts table additionally requires at least ten lifetime graded calls; 21 accounts cleared that bar in the window. Prices are daily closes from our price feed. May figures use bucket days May 7 through May 20. Quantral surfaces signals and context from public sources to support your own research. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Past signals are not indicative of future results.*