<!-- Generated from src/components/site/content.ts by scripts/generate-llm-files.ts. Do not edit by hand. -->
# We graded 6,000 r/wallstreetbets calls. Here's how often the crowd is right.

> We ran every gradeable r/wallstreetbets call from six weeks through the same scoring we use on every voice Quantral tracks. The verdict: worse than a coin flip, and much worse when the crowd shorts.

By Maya Koeva · 2026-06-23

![The r/wallstreetbets subreddit on Reddit: 4.2 million members, the tagline "Like 4chan found a Bloomberg Terminal," and the daily "What Are Your Moves Tomorrow" discussion thread.](/blog/wallstreetbets-subreddit.png)

r/wallstreetbets is the loudest stock-picking community on earth: millions of
members, hundreds of tickers a week, and a confidence level that never dips. So we
did the obvious thing. We graded it.

Over roughly the past six weeks we ran more than **6,000 gradeable r/wallstreetbets
calls** through the same scoring we use on every voice Quantral tracks: did the
stock move the way the post implied, over the timeframe it implied? The verdict is
blunt. The crowd was right about **45% of the time**, a hair worse than a coin flip.

## A coin flip that loses

45% is not nothing, but it is not an edge. Taken at face value, WSB calls would have
been wrong more often than right. That matches what we found when we
[ranked the most accurate voices](/blog/most-accurate-finance-voices-2026): WSB was
the only subreddit with enough volume to grade, and it landed below every single
individual we track.

That does not make the subreddit useless. As a read on what retail is excited or
scared about, it is unmatched, and that is [real signal](/learn/how-to-read-a-sentiment-breakdown).
It just is not a guide to who is right, which is a completely different thing, and
the difference is the whole point of [Reddit vs X](/learn/reddit-vs-x-stock-signals).

## It falls apart on the short side

The most striking pattern: WSB is a momentum-long machine, and it bleeds when it bets
against a stock. Close to half of its bullish calls worked out. Barely a third of
its bearish ones did.

You can see it in the wreckage. Every one of WSB's five worst calls over the window
was a short that got run over:

| Company | Called | Move against the call |
|---------|--------|----------------------:|
| <Co logo="/logos/RDW.png" name="Redwire" ticker="RDW" /> | bearish | +58% |
| <Co logo="/logos/MRVL.png" name="Marvell" ticker="MRVL" /> | bearish | +52% |
| <Co logo="/logos/FLY.png" name="Firefly Aerospace" ticker="FLY" /> | bearish | +34% |
| <Co logo="/logos/BB.png" name="BlackBerry" ticker="BB" /> | bearish | +32% |
| <Co logo="/logos/AMKR.png" name="Amkor" ticker="AMKR" /> | bearish | +25% |

When the crowd piles in against a name, it tends to pick one that is already
running. And it keeps running.

## It does land the occasional rocket

To be fair, WSB catches real momentum longs. Its best graded calls over the window,
all liquid names, all inside a single week:

| Company | Move | Window |
|---------|-----:|--------|
| <Co logo="/logos/POET.png" name="POET Technologies" ticker="POET" /> | +50% | 7d |
| <Co logo="/logos/OKTA.png" name="Okta" ticker="OKTA" /> | +49% | 7d |
| <Co logo="/logos/RKLB.png" name="Rocket Lab" ticker="RKLB" /> | +46% | 7d |
| <Co logo="/logos/CDW.png" name="CDW" ticker="CDW" /> | +30% | 7d |
| <Co logo="/logos/CSCO.png" name="Cisco" ticker="CSCO" /> | +25% | 7d |

These are real, and they are why people keep posting. But they are the exceptions a
45% hit rate already implies. We also filtered out the true lottery tickets, like a
$25M micro-cap that popped over 1,000% on a single press release. That is not a
call, it is a coin toss with a megaphone.

## What the crowd actually loves

The most-discussed names tell their own story. Micron was the runaway favorite with
nearly 900 calls, overwhelmingly bullish, and it actually worked, around 57% right.
Rocket Lab drew more than 400 calls and was the crowd's best big name at about 60%.
But the crowd also fought the tape: it was net bearish on Microsoft and right only
42% of the time doing it.

## The crowd vs the voices

Here is the comparison that matters. Over the exact same six weeks, the curated
voices Quantral tracks hit **55%**, roughly ten points better than the subreddit.
Same market, same window, same grading. The gap is not magic, it is accountability.
A named account with a track record has something to lose. An anonymous upvote does
not.

## The takeaway

r/wallstreetbets is a brilliant sentiment gauge and a poor stock picker, especially
when it shorts. Read it to feel where the crowd's head is. Do not read it to decide
who is right. For that, you want voices you can actually hold to their record.

---

*Window: graded r/wallstreetbets calls from late April through mid-June 2026 (about
six weeks; only the 7- and 30-day horizons have matured). Hit rate is the share of
gradeable calls that moved the called way, on a per-mention basis, using
split-adjusted prices. Standout calls are screened for liquidity, so no thin
micro-caps. Quantral surfaces signals and context from public sources to support
your own research. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or
sell.*
