<!-- Generated from src/ data by scripts/generate-llm-files.ts. Do not edit by hand. -->
# Who is jukan05? The record behind the chip leaker

> jukan05 is the new handle of Jukanlosreve, the semiconductor account behind the DeepSeek PTX story and a stream of Korean chip-industry scoops. Quantral has graded 70 of their stock calls: 58.6% right, third on our six-month accuracy board. Here is who they are and what the graded record says.

By Maya Koeva · 2026-08-19

![The jukan05 X profile: display name Jukan, a monochrome anime avatar over a night cityscape banner, the bio "@citrini | Not Investment Advice | DYODD", joined September 2024, 202K followers.](/blog/who-is-jukan05.png)

If you searched this handle and found nothing familiar, start here: @jukan05 is not a new
account. It is the renamed home of Jukan, the semiconductor account that built just over 200,000
followers as @Jukanlosreve by translating Korean chip-industry reporting, broker notes,
and supply-chain data into English threads, often hours before the same information
reached Western outlets. The account dates to September 2024, and its bio today is
Citrini-first: "@citrini | Not Investment Advice | DYODD". The
rename is verifiable in public records: X redirects the old status URLs to
[the current handle](https://x.com/Jukanlosreve/status/1949662983065600088), and
[Citrini Research lists @jukan05](https://www.citriniresearch.com/p/semis-memos) as the
X account of its semiconductor analyst. We track the account and grade its stock calls,
so this page covers both who Jukan is and what the graded record shows.

## Who they are

Jukan is pseudonymous, publishing under a pen name, and this profile stays within what
the account states publicly. The output speaks for itself: a high-volume feed of
translated Korean media exclusives, memory-market data (DRAM and NAND pricing, HBM
roadmaps, Korean export statistics), and summarized sell-side research, plus the
consumer-tech leaks that made the account famous.
[MacRumors keeps a source page](https://www.macrumors.com/guide/jukanlosreve/) on them
as a tech news aggregator, and Tom's Guide has called the account a reliable tipster.
The display name cycles through conference tags, GTC, COMPUTEX, ICML, and the
[newsletter's about page](https://www.semiconsam.com/about) claims sources inside the
semiconductor industry, including Samsung and SK hynix.

The account's biggest single moment came in January 2025, when its thread on a Korean
brokerage's DeepSeek analysis became the basis for
[Tom's Hardware's widely mirrored story](https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/deepseeks-ai-breakthrough-bypasses-industry-standard-cuda-uses-assembly-like-ptx-programming-instead)
on DeepSeek bypassing CUDA for PTX, one of the most consequential Nvidia stories of that
year. Since early 2026, Jukan has also written the
[Semis Memos series at Citrini Research](https://www.citriniresearch.com/p/semis-memos)
and publishes a Substack, [SemiconSam](https://www.semiconsam.com/), on top of the feed.

## What they post, in our data

Quantral has tracked the account since April 6, 2026: 838 stock posts in about four and
a half months, nearly all of them in and around the semiconductor complex. The
most-posted names, with each one's bullish-to-bearish split among the posts that carry a
direction:

| Ticker | Posts | Bullish : bearish |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NVDA (Nvidia) | 52 | 25 : 10 |
| INTC (Intel) | 45 | 30 : 4 |
| TSM (TSMC) | 33 | 13 : 2 |
| AAPL (Apple) | 30 | 10 : 11 |
| MU (Micron) | 25 | 22 : 2 |
| AMD | 17 | 13 : 2 |
| SNDK (SanDisk) | 16 | 13 : 1 |
| ASML | 12 | 10 : 1 |

Note what is missing from that table: conviction. A third or more of the account's posts
on its top names carry no direction at all, which fits what the feed is. Jukan relays and
translates; the market decides what it means. AAPL is the tell, a near-even 10 to 11
split from an account that mostly moves information rather than takes sides.

## The graded record

Relaying information is still making calls, and the calls grade out well. On
[Quantral's six-month accuracy board](/blog/most-accurate-finance-voices-2026), @jukan05
ranked third of every account we track: 70 graded calls, 58.6% right, with a best graded
call of DELL at +43% in seven days. On the [Q2 board](/blog/most-accurate-voices-q2-2026)
they placed ninth with 70 graded calls in the quarter.

Third place undersells it. The number-one account on that same board,
[@citrini](/voices/citrini) at 64.2% across 81 graded calls, is Citrini Research, the
shop Jukan has written the Semis Memos for since January 2026. Count it that way and one
pseudonymous analyst has a hand in two of the top three accounts we track: the research
house they write for at number one, and their own feed at number three.

The comparison worth making is with the thesis-writers above them on the board. The
number-two account, [@aleabitoreddit](/blog/who-is-aleabitoreddit), posts concentrated,
high-conviction supply-chain theses and graded out at 59.5%. Jukan posts translated
scoops and data, hedged and sourced, and graded out at 58.6%. Two opposite styles, one percentage point apart, and both wrong roughly four
times in ten. That last number is the honest context for every follower count in this
story: the best graded hit rate on our board is about 64%, so nobody in the set,
aggregator or oracle, escapes the error bar.

## The August controversy

A profile written this week cannot skip it. In early August 2026, posts from the
account's past online life surfaced on X. Jukan confirmed some were theirs and
[published an apology](https://www.odaily.news/en/newsflash/509956), citing
inappropriate remarks, unauthorized use of others' information, and insufficient source
attribution, and acknowledging that account growth had sometimes been prioritized over
verification. They pledged clearer sourcing going forward. The handle change to @jukan05
appears in public records around the same period, which is likely why you searched this
handle in the first place.

We are not the judge of any of that. We grade stock calls, and the grading is indifferent
to reputation in both directions: the record stood at third on our board before August,
and every call since gets graded the same way. If the sourcing pledge changes the quality
of the feed, the number will show it.

## Follow the calls, graded

The useful question about an aggregator account is not whether the scoops are exciting
but whether acting on them would have been right. That is an answerable question. The
live version of @jukan05's record, updated as calls resolve, is on
[their Quantral voice page](/voices/jukan05), next to every other account we track,
including the [thesis-writers they share the board with](/blog/most-accurate-finance-voices-2026).
Check the record before you check the headline.

---

*Graded-call figures are Quantral's own methodology (subject calls graded over fixed
windows; see [how a track record is graded](/learn/how-a-track-record-is-graded)) as
published on the boards linked above. Post counts and splits cover the account's tracked
stock posts from April 6 to August 16, 2026. Claims attributed to the account or to
third-party coverage are theirs, not ours, and are linked to their sources. Quantral
surfaces signals and context from public sources to support your own research. Nothing
here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or follow anyone. Past
performance is not indicative of future results.*
