<!-- Generated from src/ data by scripts/generate-llm-files.ts. Do not edit by hand. -->
# Quantral vs Simply Wall St: the business at a glance, or the room at a glance

> Simply Wall St turns fundamentals into one Snowflake. Quantral turns the conversation around a company into one score. An honest comparison.

By Maya Koeva · 2026-08-13

Simply Wall St and Quantral both start from the same idea: you should be able to size up a stock in
seconds rather than in an afternoon. Simply Wall St does it with the Snowflake, a
five-sided shape that shows you a company's value, growth, past performance, financial health, and
dividends at a glance. Quantral does it with one score from 0 to 100 that shows you where the
credible part of the conversation is leaning. Both compress a lot into a small picture. They
compress different things.

## At a glance

| | <AppIcon src="/logos/apps/simply-wall-st.png" alt="Simply Wall St" /> | <AppIcon src="/logos/apps/quantral.png" alt="Quantral" /> |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Visual fundamental analysis | A social-crowd signal, weighted by track record |
| What it summarizes | The company's financials | The conversation about the company |
| The visual | The Snowflake, across five dimensions | One 0-100 signal score |
| Coverage | Over 120,000 stocks across about 90 markets | US stocks |
| Weighs voices by track record | It reads financials, not voices | Yes, every post |
| Timing | Updates with filings and estimates | The live conversation, in real time |
| Also gives you | Plain-language reports, portfolio tracking, screening | Month-by-month recaps and key stats on every company |
| Price | About $10/mo billed annually, around $120/yr | 7-day trial, then $9.99 to $14.99/mo |
| Best for | Understanding a business fast | Finding the stocks worth understanding |

## The core difference: the company or the room

The Snowflake summarizes the books. Simply Wall St pulls a company's financials, grades it on
value, future growth, past performance, financial health, and dividends, and draws the result as a
shape. A fat Snowflake means the numbers look good across the board. A spiky one tells you where the
weakness sits. Then the plain-language report explains what you are looking at, which is the part
that has made this the friendliest entry into fundamental research.

Quantral summarizes the part no financial statement contains: what people are saying about the stock.
It reads posts across finance X, Reddit, and Substack, weights each one by
[how right that account has been before](/learn/how-a-track-record-is-graded), and turns the result
into a [0-100 score](/learn/what-is-a-stock-signal). A wall of posts from unproven accounts barely
moves it. A few dated theses from accounts with a real record move it a lot.

Simply Wall St tells you whether a business holds up. Quantral tells you whether the people worth
listening to have noticed. Neither one predicts the price, and a stock can look strong on one and
weak on the other without either being broken.

## Feature by feature

### Breadth

Simply Wall St wins on coverage without much argument: over 120,000 stocks across roughly 90 markets,
so if you invest outside the US you are covered. Quantral is US stocks only. If your portfolio holds
London or Sydney listings, that settles it on its own.

### What the score is built from

The Snowflake grades against a fixed set of financial checks, which makes it consistent and
comparable across companies. Two limits are worth knowing: the underlying data runs about ten years
back, and the checks are not calibrated by industry, so a capital-heavy business can look worse than
it is against a software company. Simply Wall St is upfront that the Snowflake is a starting point
rather than a verdict.

Quantral's score has a different limit. It only knows what people are posting. On a widely discussed
name it has plenty to read; on a quiet small cap it has little, and a low mention count means we have
thin coverage of that name, not that the market is silent about it. Read the score alongside how many
accounts are behind it.

### What you do next

After a Snowflake you usually want to check a thesis, and Simply Wall St gives you the report,
analyst estimates, and portfolio tracking to hold the position afterwards. After a Quantral score you
usually want to see who is behind it, so every company page shows the mentions that moved the number,
the accounts that posted them, and a month-by-month recap of what the crowd argued about. One
continues into the financials. The other continues into the evidence.

### Price

Simply Wall St runs about $10 a month billed annually, so around $120 a year, with a free tier that
lets you look at Snowflakes before paying. Quantral is $14.99 a month, or $9.99 a month billed
yearly, after a 7-day free trial. The two land within a few dollars of each other annually, and
Quantral offers a monthly option.

## Who Simply Wall St is best for

Simply Wall St is the better pick if you already have names in mind and want to understand them
quickly. If you hold positions for years and care about financial health, dividends, and valuation,
around $120 a year buys research that explains itself in plain English. The international coverage
seals it if you invest outside the US.

## Who Quantral is best for

Quantral is the better pick if your problem comes earlier: which names to put through a Snowflake in
the first place. It reads the conversation live, discounts accounts that have been wrong, and ranks
every US stock, so a short list surfaces on its own from what credible people are posting about. You
can see how it reads a name on the [stock signal pages](/stocks).

## Common questions

### Is Quantral a Simply Wall St alternative?

Not for the job Simply Wall St does. It does no fundamental analysis, draws no Snowflake, and covers
US stocks only. It replaces the step before that one, where you decide which companies are worth
analysing. For the wider field, see
[the best stock-idea apps of 2026](/blog/best-stock-investment-ideas-apps-2026).

### What if the Snowflake and the score disagree?

That happens often and it is usually the interesting case. Strong fundamentals with a cold signal can
mean a good business nobody has a reason to buy yet. A hot signal on weak fundamentals can mean a
story running ahead of the numbers, which is worth knowing before you join it. Treat the
disagreement as a question to answer rather than a contradiction to resolve.

### Which one is cheaper?

They are close. Simply Wall St is around $120 a year, Quantral is $9.99 to $14.99 a month depending
on the plan. Simply Wall St bills annually; Quantral lets you pay monthly.

### Can I use both?

This is the cleanest pairing of any comparison we have written. Quantral to find the name and see who
is behind it, Simply Wall St to check whether the business underneath it stands up. Finding and
vetting are separate jobs, and these two barely overlap.

## Choosing between them

Simply Wall St makes a company legible in seconds. Quantral makes the conversation around a company
legible in seconds. If you know which stocks you care about and want to judge the business, Simply
Wall St, especially outside the US. If the harder question is which stocks deserve that attention at
all, that is what Quantral is for.

---

*Quantral surfaces signals and context from public sources to support your own research. Nothing
here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell. Simply Wall St details and pricing are
approximate and current as of 2026; check Simply Wall St directly for the latest.*
