Who actually called it? The most accurate finance voices, graded

Quantral grades every call from the finance voices it tracks against what the stock did next, and this board ranks the accounts by how often they were right.

As of October 28, 2026, the most accurate account on Quantral's accuracy board is @SKundojjala, right on 65.5% of 58 graded calls. The board counts each account's full graded record, winners and losers alike, and ranks only accounts with at least 50 graded calls.

As of October 28, 2026. Window: each account's full graded record on Quantral through October 28, 2026, with at least 50 graded calls to qualify. Hit rate is the share of graded calls that moved the called way (a move under 2% counts as flat, neither right nor wrong). Calls are graded at the timeframe they implied (7, 30, 90 or 180 days) on split-adjusted prices. The standout call is each account's best correct call on a company worth at least $2 billion at the time. Verified calls only.

The ranking changed since June

We first published this board on June 22, 2026, when @citrini, @aleabitoreddit and @jukan05 held the top three. @citrini is fifth today, three of the June ten are still on the board (@citrini, @mkfilko and @Gaetano2026), and seven names are new. As of October 28, @aleabitoreddit grades out at 52.1% across 213 calls and @jukan05 at 48.4% across 91, so neither makes the top ten. Each June figure described the board on that date; the table above replaces them.

It's an X game, for now

Every name in the top ten posts on X. Reddit is part of what Quantral tracks, and we grade r/wallstreetbets as one crowd: as of October 28 it was right on 44% of 1,705 graded calls. The crowd is loud, and on this measure it is wrong more often than right.

Being right is a grind, not a moonshot

The standout calls jump off the page: @Gaetano2026 caught Marvell up 181% over 180 days, and @SKundojjala caught Western Digital up 178% over the same span. They are real, but each is that account's single best hit.

These accounts earned their spot by being right a little more than half the time, call after call.

Volume doesn't dull the edge

@mkfilko has the biggest sample in the top ten, 134 graded calls, and grades out at 56.0%; @Gaetano2026 holds 54.6% across 97. Holding above 50% over a hundred calls says more than a short hot streak.

Nobody is right nine times out of ten

The best hit rate on the board is 65.5%, from @SKundojjala over 58 calls. After that it slides from about 61% into the mid-50s. Even the sharpest voices we track are wrong about a third of the time, so treat any account that promises more certainty with suspicion. A track record beats a highlight reel for that reason. We dug into that in how to tell if a finance influencer is worth following.

How we graded it

Quantral grades calls, not vibes. For each tracked author we identify directional calls, match each one to the timeframe it implied (a swing-trade idea graded over a week, a longer thesis over months), and check whether the price moved the called way. We count every call, winners and losers alike, not the ones an author chose to remember. An account needs at least five graded calls to appear anywhere in Quantral; the ten here had between 53 and 134.

The takeaway

The loudest voice and the most accurate one are rarely the same account. Use a ranking like this as a starting filter, then read the reasoning behind the calls. A hit rate tells you who has been right, not why, and the why is what you actually need before you act.

---

Quantral surfaces signals and context from public sources to support your own research. Nothing here is financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell.